Thursday, October 1, 2015

The Bible, Homosexuality, and a Christian Response – Part 8

Stained glass window illustrating
the parable of the Good Samaritan
Church of St. Eutrope,
Clermont-Ferrand, France
The Greatest Commandment and the Good Samaritan

Jesus said the Golden Rule “… is the Law and the Prophets.” He explained this and expanded on it later when He was being questioned by the Pharisees, Saducees, and lawyers.

35 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, 36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? 37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
– Matthew 22:35-40

So we love God and we love others. Love is more than just saying, it is doing.

15 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, 16 and one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?
– James 2:15-16

Just saying, “I love you” isn’t enough to convince people that you love them. People want to see actions. They want to see that you care.

Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
– James 2:18

Love and faith are expressed in action, not in words.

In the Greatest Commandment, Jesus quotes Leviticus 19:18, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” But who is our neighbor? Is it the person who lives next door to you? Is it the person across the street? Is it just the people who you think live in your neighborhood? Is it just people you know?

Jesus was asked a very similar question.

25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, “Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?”
26 He said unto him, “What is written in the law? how readest thou?”
27 And he answering said, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.”
28 And he said unto him, “Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.”
29 But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, “And who is my neighbour?”
– Luke 10:25-29

Jesus responded with a parable that has become known as The Parable of the Good Samaritan. Before we get into that, we need a little background on who the Samaritans were in relation to the Jews.

The Samaritans are an ethnic and religious group in what is now north eastern Israel. The Samaritans descend from the remnant of Israel that were not taken into captivity in Babylon. They do not accept as inspired anything other than the first five books of the Bible and they believe that the center of religious worship is not the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, but Mount Gerizim.

Samaria was its own region in Christ’s time. The Jews hated the Samaritans and thought they were lower than dogs. The Jews of Christ’s time hated the Samaritans so much that they would take a longer route around Samaria rather than go through it so they wouldn’t be defiled by the Samaritans. The Samaritans weren’t as legalistic as the Jews and had no problem going into Israel, but suffice it to say, the feeling of animosity was mutual.

With that context in mind, consider Christ’s parable about the Good Samaritan.

30 And Jesus answering said, “A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. 31 And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32 And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. 33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, 34 and went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, ‘Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.’ 36 Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?” 37 And he said, “He that shewed mercy on him.” Then said Jesus unto him, “Go, and do thou likewise.”
– Luke 10:30-37

In the story, the people the Jews most expected to help a fallen Jew were other Jews. Instead, the fallen Jew is rescued by a Samaritan.

There are a lot of allusions to Jewish civil and ceremonial law in this parable, especially the holiness code. If a person were to touch a dead body, they would be considered unclean for the rest of the day. The victim may have looked dead which would explain why the priest avoided him. There were similar issues with handling blood. He didn't want to be prohibited from doing his priestly duties for an entire day. His sense of self-importance combined with his legalism overrode his sense of humanity. But he didn't just ignore the guy, he made a big show of ignoring the guy, passing by on the other side!

In Luke 14, Jesus healed a man on the Sabbath and was criticized by the Pharisees. Jesus responded with the question, "Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the sabbath day?" (Luke 14:15) In other words, our sense of humanity should always outweigh any objection to helping people. Humanity trumps The Law every time.

The next guy was a Levite. Levites had all kinds of temple responsibilities even though they weren't priests. A Levite should have been an expert in The Law and as such should have known Leviticus 19:18 to "Love your neighbor as yourself." The Levite went over and looked at the guy, probably to see if it was someone he knew. He didn't know the victim, so he didn't consider him his neighbor and walked away.

The Samaritan on the other hand saw the victim, probably knew he was a Jew, set his animosity toward Jews aside and helped out, rendering aid and paying for his treatment.

“Go and do thou likewise.”

Because of the lawyer’s animosity toward the Samaritans, he couldn’t bring himself to say the Samaritan was the neighbor to the man that was mugged, but the lawyer couldn’t deny the moral of the story: that everybody is our neighbor and the man who helped the most was the most neighborly. People that are intolerant of us are our neighbors. People that persecute us are our neighbors. Everybody around the world are our neighbors.

Many cultures have at different times through history taken this story and updated it for their own time. I heard of a Southern Preacher in the 1850s who told the story of a free slave who helped a slave owner. While researching, I found some humerous updates of the story involving fans from rival sports teams (Red Sox/Yankees and Cowboys/Redskins). I even found a politicized version where the victim dies because of regulation and bureaucracy.

Here's an updated version for today.

A Christian woman from a legalistic church went for a walk in the park. While in the park, she was stripped, raped, beaten and left for dead. Not long after, her pastor came by, seeing her naked and not wanting to be caught with a naked woman, completely avoided her.

A little while later, a woman from a different church came by and saw her, but thought, "perhaps God is punishing her for some sin in her life. She probably deserved it," and continued on her way.

Then, an avowed atheist and lesbian seeing the woman laying there called 911, rendered first aid and stayed with her until paramedics came. After giving her statement to the police, the lesbian drove to the hospital and paid for the woman's medical expenses.

Which of these three, do you think, was a neighbour to her that was victimized?

If everyone is our neighbor, then homosexuals are our neighbors. It may be that in our time of need, we may have to depend on a homosexual to help us. We need to be willing to help and to reach out to them when we are given the opportunity.

No comments:

Post a Comment